Using the Incomplete and emerging research into video type and presentation to inform video production for teachers
Using the Incomplete and emerging research into video type and presentation to inform video production for teachers
It is widely agreed among researchers that video-based
learning in conjunction with pedagogical methods have the potential to improve
learning outcomes (Lubrick & Zhou & Zhang, 2019; Yousef, Chatti,
Schroeder & Wosnitza, 2014). Among teachers, there is a wide range of video
forms being produced, using a range of technologies and approaches. The newness
of these strategies, video production forms and technologies being applied to
education means that in this case educators are ahead of the research and
innovating often without, and indeed in spite of the emerging data from the
educational research community. To illustrate this fact: Lightboard technology
can be dated to 2013 (Lubrick & Zhou & Zhang, 2019); whilst Flipped
Learning as a methodology begun in 2009 (Bishop & Verleger, 2013); Green-Screen
use in education is hard to pin down in the research, but has appeared as early
as 2012 (Sheffield & Swan) but is not widely discussed or studied within
the research. Most often to explore perspectives from research on video-based
learning outcomes we need to tap into theory and limited and comparative study
designs. The limited, comparative studies tend to compare video-based
instruction with other forms of video, or traditional teaching methods and then
generalise from these comparisons. The theories are useful, but often rest on
other theories, that are themselves challengeable and still being debated
within the educational community. As such, the coverage of things that we
believe we know about video-based learning are suggestive only and may well be
disproven or challenged by forthcoming research.
Things that have shown positive connections to learning:
Theory
|
References
|
|
Gesture
|
·
Mayer’s
Multimedia Learning Theory: Signalling principle
·
Social Learning
Theory
·
Observational
Learning Theory
|
·
Mayer, 2005
·
Mautone &
Mayer, 2001
·
Bandura, 1986
·
Mayer &
Fiorella, 2014
|
Pointing, arrows
|
·
Cognitive Load
Theory
·
Mayer’s
Multimedia Learning Theory: Signalling principle
|
·
Sweller
(Sweller, Ayres & Kalyuga, 2011; Sweller & Schmidt, 2016; Sweller,
Kirschner & Clark, 2016; Sweller, Kirschner & Clark, 2007; Sweller,
2016; Sweller, Van Merrieboer & Paas, 2019)
·
Atkinson, Derry,
Renkl & Wortham, 2000
·
Mautone &
Mayer, 2001
|
Drawing whilst talking supports learning
|
·
Fiorella & Mayer, 2016
·
Guo, Kim &
Rubin, 2014
·
Lasser &
Toloza, 2017
|
|
Synchronised video and audio and
physical elements
|
·
Mayer’s
Mulitmedia Learning Theory, Temporal contiguity
|
·
Ginnis, 2006
·
Mayer &
Fiorella, 2014
·
Mayer &
Moreno, 2003
·
Michas &
Berry, 2000
|
Short Video lengths are superior
|
·
Carmichael,
Reid & Karpicke, 2018
·
Lawlor &
Donnelly, 2010
·
Doolittle, Bryant
& Chittum, 2015
|
|
Facial Expression
|
·
Social Agency
Theory
|
·
Mayer, 2017
|
Segmenting or chunking of videos if
longer
|
·
Mayer &
Pilegard, 2014
·
Guo, Kim &
Rubin, 2014
·
Lasser &
Toloza, 2017
|
|
Talking head + slides is superior to
audio and slides only
|
·
Guo, Kim &
Rubin, 2014
·
Lasser &
Toloza, 2017
|
|
Instructor presence is good
|
·
Carmichael,
Reid & Karpicke, 2018
·
Pi, Hong &
Yang, 2017
|
Though only a beginning point for the things that we believe
we can reasonably establish in regard to video-based instruction, I personally have
found the above summation of my recent research instructive. It is important as
teachers using video in our classes, be it in a flipped, blended or any other model
of approach to this, that we keep these concepts in our mind. They are not
confirmed or hard science as of yet, but they are strongly suggestive of the
directions we should follow when producing video for our students. As we
venture into areas that may not be fully understood or explored, we should wherever
possible aim to ground ourselves in the work of these talented academics whose
work should be used to point the direction forward for us teachers.
References:
Arenas, E. (2015). Affordances of learning technologies in
higher education multicultural environments. Electronic Journal of
E-Learning, 13(4), 217-227.
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D.
(2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked
examples research. Review of educational research, 70(2), 181-214.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of
self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
Bergmann & Sams (2012) Flip Your Classroom: Talk to
Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in
Education.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The
flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE national conference
proceedings, Atlanta, GA (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1-18).
Carmichael, M., Reid, A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2018).
Assessing the impact of educational video on student engagement, critical
thinking and learning: the current state of play. white paper, Sage
Publishing.
Doolittle, P. E., Bryant, L. H., & Chittum, J. R.
(2015). Effects of degree of segmentation and learner disposition on multimedia
learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6),
1333-1343.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to
promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717-741.
Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis
of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and
instruction, 16(6), 511-525.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014, March). How
video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos.
In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp.
41-50). ACM.
Laaser, W., & Toloza, E. A. (2017). The changing role of
the educational video in higher distance education. The International
Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2).
Lawlor, B., & Donnelly, R. (2010). Using podcasts to
support communication skills development: A case study for content format
preferences among postgraduate research students. Computers &
education, 54(4), 962-971.
Lubrick, M., Zhou, G., & Zhang, J. (2019). Is the Future
Bright? The Potential of Lightboard Videos for Student Achievement and
Engagement in Learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education, 15, 8.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia
learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 3148.
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403-423.
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). 12 Principles for
Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning: Coherence, Signaling,
Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles. The
Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 279.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce
cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Michas, I. C., & Berry, D. C. (2000). Learning a
procedural task: effectiveness of multimedia presentations. Applied Cognitive
Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory
and Cognition, 14(6), 555-575.
Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a
cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of educational Psychology,
93(2), 377.
Mayer, R. E., & Pilegard, C. (2005). Principles for
managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining,
and modality principles. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning,
169-182.
Pi, Z., Hong, J., & Yang, J. (2017). Does instructor's
image size in video lectures affect learning outcomes?. Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning, 33(4), 347-354.
Sheffield, C., & Swan, S. (2012). Digital reenactments:
using green screen technology to recreate the past. Social Education, 76(2),
92-95.
Sweller, J. & Ayres, P. & Kalyuga, S. (2011)
Cognitive load theory, New York, Springer-Verlag.
Sweller, J & Schmidt, H. (2016) Panel discussion.
Presentation at PBL Congress Zurich. Retrieved from: https://www.pbl2016.ch/de/english/congress-review/,
accessed on 25/2/2019
Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007).
Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to
commentaries. Educational psychologist, 42(2), 115-121.
Sweller, J. (2016) Problem-based learning. Presentation
at PBL Congress Zurich. Retrieved from: https://www.pbl2016.ch/de/english/congress-review/,
accessed on 25/2/2019
Sweller, J., van Merriƫnboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F.
(2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later.
Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., &
Wosnitza, M. (2014, July). What drives a successful MOOC? An empirical
examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs. In 2014 IEEE 14th
International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 44-48). IEEE.
Running Word Count: 23,128
Originally Published:
Running Word Count: 23,128
Originally Published:
Comments
Post a Comment